Features

Copy item link
Add item to favorites
Functions required for a linear guide surface
Large permissible load Smooth motion with no clearance
Highly rigid in all directions Superb high-speed performance
High positioning repeatability Easy maintenance
Running accuracy can be easily obtained Can be used in various environments
High accuracy can be maintained over a long period
Features of the LM Guide
Large permissible load and high rigidity
Averages accuracy by absorbing mounting surface error
Ideal structure with four raceway, circular-arc grooves, and two-point contact
Superb error-absorbing capability with DF design
Low friction coefficient
Wide array of options (QZ Lubricator, Laminated Contact Scraper LaCS, etc.)

As a result, the following features are achieved.

Easy maintenance
Improved productivity of the machine
Substantial energy savings
Low total cost
Higher accuracy of the machine
Higher efficiency in machine design

Large Permissible Load and High Rigidity

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

Large Permissible Load

The LM Guide has raceway grooves with a radius almost equal to the ball radius, which is a significant difference from products such as a linear bushing. Fig. 1 compares LM Guide units and linear bushings with similar basic dynamic load ratings. The marked difference in size indicates that more compact design can be achieved with the LM Guide.

This is because the structure of the curved groove (with a radius equal to 52% of the ball diameter) allows each ball to bear a load 13 times greater than it could in a structure in which the balls contact a flat surface. Since service life is proportional to the cube of the permissible load, this increased ball-bearing load translates into a service life that is approximately 2,200 times that of a linear bushing.

Table1: Load Capacity per Ball (P and P1 )
Permissible contact surface pressure: 4,200 MPa
     

Ball diameter

R-groove (P)

Flat surface (P1)

P/P1

⌀3.175(1/8")

0.90 kN

0.07 kN

13

⌀4.763(3/16")

2.03 kN

0.16 kN

13

⌀6.350(1/4")

3.61 kN

0.28 kN

13

⌀7.938(5/16")

5.64 kN

0.44 kN

13

⌀11.906(15/32")

12.68 kN

0.98 kN

13

High Rigidity

The LM Guide is capable of bearing vertical and horizontal loads. Additionally, due to the circular-arc groove design, it is capable of carrying a preload as necessary to increase its rigidity.
When compared with a feed screw shaft system and a spindle in rigidity, the guide surface using an LM Guide has higher rigidity.

Example of comparing static rigidity between the LM Guide, a feed screw shaft system, and a spindle

(vertical machining center with the main shaft motor of 7.5 kW)

Components

LM Guide

:

SVR45LC/C0
(C0 clearance: preload = 11.11 kN)

Ball screw

:

BNFN4010-5/G0
(G0 clearance: preload = 2.64 kN)

Spindle

:

general-purpose cutting spindle

Table 2: Comparison of Static Rigidity
Unit: N/μm

Components

X-axis direction

Y-axis direction

Z-axis direction

LM Guide

-

2,400

9,400 (radial)

7,400 (reverse-radial)

Ball screw

330

-

-

Spindle

250

250

280

  • Note: The rigidity of the feed screw shaft system includes rigidity of the shaft end support bearing.

High Precision of Motion

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

Minimal Lost Motion

The LM Guide is provided with an ideal rolling mechanism. Therefore, the difference between dynamic and static friction is minimal and lost motion hardly occurs.

Table 3: Lost Motion Comparison
Unit: μm

Type

Clearance

Test method

As per JIS B 6330

Based on minimum unit feeding

10 mm/min

500 mm/min

4000 mm/min

LM Guide (HSR45)

C1 clearance1

2.3

5.3

3.9

0

C0 clearance1

3.6

4.4

3.1

1

Square slide

+turcite

0.02 mm

10.7

15

14.1

14

0.005 mm

8.7

13.1

12.1

13

1See table below
Radial Clearance of the LM Guide
Unit: μm

Symbol

C1

C0

Radial clearance

-25 to -10

-40 to -25

High Running Accuracy

Use of the LM Guide allows you to achieve high running accuracy.

High Accuracy Maintained over a Long Period

The LM Guide employs an ideal rolling mechanism with negligible wear and high precision that is maintained over a long period of time. As shown in Fig. 6, when the LM Guide operates under both a preload and a normal load, more than 90% of the preload remains even after running 2,000 km.

Conditions

Model No.

:

HSR65LA3SSC0+2565LP-Ⅱ

Radial clearance

:

C0 (preload: 15.7 kN)

Stroke

:

1,050 mm

Speed

:

15 m/min (stops 5 sec at both ends)

Acceleration/decelelation time in rapid motion

:

300 ms (acceleration: α = 0.833 m/s2)

Mass

:

6,000 kg

Drive

:

Ball screw

Lubrication

:

Lithium soap-based grease No. 2 (greased every 100 km)

Averages Accuracy by Absorbing Mounting Surface Error

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

The LM Guide contains highly spherical balls and has a self-contained structure with no clearance. In addition, because several LM rails can be used in parallel to form a multiple-axis guide system, the LM Guide is capable of averaging and absorbing straightness, flatness, or parallelism errors that might occur in the machining of the base to which the LM Guide is to be mounted or in the installation of the LM Guide.
The magnitude of the averaging effect varies according to the length or size of the misalignment, the preload applied on the LM Guide, and the number of axes in the multiple-axis configuration. When misalignment is given to one of the LM rails of the table as shown in Fig. 8, the magnitude of misalignment and the actual dynamic accuracy of the table (straightness in the horizontal direction) are as shown in Fig. 9.
By applying such characteristics obtained with the averaging effect, you can easily establish a guide system with highly precise motion.

Even on a roughly milled mounting surface, the LM Guide drastically increases the running accuracy of the top face of the table.

Installation Example

When comparing the mounting surface accuracy (a) and the table running accuracy (b), the results are:

Vertical

92.5 μm

15 μm

=

1/6

Horizontal

28 μm

4 μm

=

1/7

Table 4: Actual Measurement of Mounting Surface Accuracy
Unit: μm

Direction

Mounting surface

Straightness

Average (a)

Vertical

Bottom surface

A

80

92.5

B

105

Horizontal

Side surface

C

40

28

D

16

Table 5: Actual Measurement of Running Accuracy on the Table (Based on Measurement in Fig. 10 and Fig. 11)
Unit: μm

Direction

Measurement point

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Straightness (b)

Vertical

0

+2

+8

+13

+15

+9

+5

0

15

Horizontal

0

+1

+2

+3

+2

+2

-1

0

4

Easy Maintenance

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

Unlike with sliding guides, the LM Guide does not incur uneven wear. As a result, sliding surfaces do not need to be reconditioned, and precision does not need not be altered. Regarding lubrication, sliding guides require forced circulation of a large amount of lubricant to maintain an oil film on the sliding surfaces, whereas the LM Guide only needs periodical replenishing of a small amount of grease or lubricant. This makes maintenance simple and also helps keep the work environment clean.

Substantial Energy Savings

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

As shown in Table 6, the LM Guide has a substantial energy saving effect.

Table 6: Comparative Data on Sliding and Rolling Characteristics

Machine specifications

Type of machine

Single-axis surface grinding machine
(sliding guide)

Three-axis surface grinding machine
(rolling guide)

Overall length × overall width

13 m × 3.2 m

12.6 m × 2.6 m

Total mass

17,000 kg

16,000 kg

Table mass

5,000 kg

5,000 kg

Grinding area

0.7 m × 5 m

0.7 m × 5 m

Table guide

Rolling through V-V guide

Rolling through LM Guide installation

No. of grinding stone axes

Single axis (5.5 kW)

Three axes (5.5 kW + 3.7 kW x 2)
Grinding capacity: 3 times greater

Table drive specifications

Ratio

Motor used

38.05 kW

3.7 kW

10.3

Drive hydraulic pressure

Bore diameter ⌀160 × 1.2 MPa

Bore diameter ⌀65 × 0.7 MPa

-

Thrust

23,600 N

2,270 N

10.4

Electric Power consumption

38 kWH

3.7 kWH

10.3

Drive hydraulic pressure oil consumption

400 /year

250 /year

1.6

Lubricant consumption

60 /year (oil)

3.6 /year (grease)

16.7

Low Total Cost

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

Compared with a sliding guide, the LM Guide is easier to assemble and does not require highly skilled technicians to perform the adjustment work. This reduces assembly labor and allows machines and systems incorporating the LM Guide to be produced at a lower cost. The figure below shows an example of the difference in the assembly procedures for machining centers that use sliding guides and those that use the LM Guide.
Normally, with a sliding guide, the surface on which the guide is installed must be ground to a very smooth finish. However, the LM Guide can offer high precision even if the surface is milled or planed. Using the LM Guide thus cuts down on machining labor and lowers machining costs as a whole.

Assembly Procedure for a Machining Center

Using the LM Guide Using a square guide (sliding guide)

When extremely high precision is not required (e.g., running accuracy), the LM Guide can be attached to the steel plate even if the black scale on it is not removed.

Ideal Structure with Four Raceways, Circular-Arc Grooves, and Two-Point Contact

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

The LM Guide has a self-adjusting capability that competitors’ products do not have. This feature is achieved by an ideal structure with four raceways, circular-arc grooves, and two-point contact.

Comparison of Characteristics between the LM Guide and Similar Products

LM Guide: structure with four raceways, circular-
arc grooves, and two-point contact
Other Product: structure with two raceways,
Gothic-arch grooves, and four-point contact

LM Guide Model HSR

Two-row Gothic-arch groove product

As indicated in Fig. 12 and Fig. 13, for each revolution, the ball slips a distance equal to the difference between the circumference of the inner contact diameter (πd1) and the circumference of the outer contact diameter (πd2). (This slip is called differential slip.) If the difference is large, the ball rotates while slipping, the friction coefficient increases more than 10 times, and the friction resistance steeply increases.

LM Guide: structure with four raceways,
circular-arc grooves, and two-point contact

Structure with two raceways,
Gothic-arch grooves, and four-point contact

Smooth Motion

Since the balls contact the raceway at two points in the load direction, as shown in Fig. 12 and Fig. 13, whether under preload or normal load, the difference between d1 and d2 is small, as is the differential slip, allowing a smooth rolling motion.

The difference between d1and d2in the contact area is large as shown in Fig. 12 and Fig. 13. Therefore, if any of the following occurs, the ball will generate differential slip, causing friction almost as large as sliding resistance and shortening the service life as a result of abnormal wear.
(1) A preload is applied
(2) A lateral load is applied.
(3) If two or more rails are mounted and they are not properly aligned
(4) If spinning occurs

Accuracy of the Mounting Surface

In the ideal two-point contact structure, four rows of circular-arc grooves are given appropriate contact angles. With this structure, a light distortion of the mounting surface is absorbed within the LM block due to elastic deformation of the balls and moving of the contact points to allow unforced, smooth motion. This eliminates the need for a robust mounting base with high rigidity and accuracy for machinery such as conveyance systems.

In a product with Gothic-arch grooves, each ball contacts the groove at four points, which inhibits elastic deformation in the ball and prevents the contact points from moving (i.e., the product has no self-adjusting capability). Therefore, even a slight distortion of the mounting surface or an accuracy error of the rail bed cannot be absorbed, and smooth motion cannot be achieved. Accordingly, it is necessary to machine a highly rigid mounting base with high precision and mount a high-precision rail.

Rigidity

With two-point contact, even if a relatively large preload is applied, the rolling resistance does not abnormally increase and high rigidity can be obtained. Since differential slip occurs due to four-point contact, a sufficient preload cannot be applied and high rigidity cannot be obtained.

Since differential slip occurs due to the four-point contact, a sufficient preload cannot be applied and high rigidity cannot be obtained.

Load Rating

Since the curvature radius of the ball raceway is 51% to 52% of the ball diameter, a large rated load can be obtained.

Since the curvature radius of the Gothic-arch groove has to be 55% to 60% of the ball diameter, the rated load is reduced to approximately 50% of that of the circular arc groove.

Difference in Rigidity

As shown in Fig. 14 , the rigidity widely varies according to the difference in curvature radius or difference in preload.

Curvature Radius and Rigidity

Difference in Service Life

Since the load rating of the Gothic-arch groove is reduced to approximately 50% of that of the circular-arc groove, the service life also decreases to 87.5%.

Accuracy Error of the Mounting Surface and Test Data on Rolling Resistance

The difference between the contact structures translates into a rolling resistance.
In the Gothic-arch groove contact structure, each ball makes contact at four points and differential slip or spinning occurs if a preload is applied to increase rigidity or if there is large error in the mounting precision. This sharply increases the rolling resistance and causes abnormal wear at an early stage.
The following are test data obtained by comparing an LM Guide with the four-raceway, circular-arc groove, two-point contact structure and a product with a two-raceway, Gothic-arch, four-point contact structure.

Sample

(1)

LM Guide

SR30W (radial type)

2 sets

HSR35A (4-way equal-load type)

2 sets

(2)

Two-row, Gothic-arch groove product

Type with dimensions similar to HSR30

2 sets

Conditions

Radial clearance: ±0 μm
Without seal
Without lubrication
Load: table mass of 30 kg

Data 1: Preload and Rolling Resistance

When a preload is applied, the rolling resistance of the Gothic-arch groove product steeply increases and differential slip occurs. Even under a preload, the rolling resistance of the LM Guide does not increase.

Data 2: Error in Parallelism between Two Axes and Rolling Resistance

As shown in the Fig. 15, part of the rails mounted in parallel is displaced and the rolling resistance at that point is measured.
With the Gothic-arch groove product, the rolling resistance is 34 N when the error in parallelism is 0.03 mm and 62 N when the error is 0.04 mm. These resistances are equivalent to the slip friction coefficients, indicating that the balls are in sliding contact with the groove.

Data 3: Difference between the Levels of the Top and Bottom Rails and Rolling Resistance

Displace the bottom of either rail vertically by S and create the height difference between the two axes. Then, measure the rolling resistance. If the LM Guide has a Gothic-arch groove, this will cause spinning. An LM Guide with a circular-arc groove is capable of absorbing the error caused by a height difference between rails as great as 0.3/200 mm, where its rolling resistance will not increase significantly.

Superb Error-Absorbing Capability with DF Design

Copy item link
Add item to favorites

Since the LM Guide has a contact structure similar to the front-to-front mount of angular ball bearings, it has superb self-adjusting capability.

An LM ball guide mounted on a plane receives a moment (M) due to an error in flatness or level or a deflection of the table. Therefore, it is essential for the guide to have self-adjusting capability.

LM Guide Model HSR

Similar Product of a Competitor

Since the distance between the application points of the bearings is small, the internal load generated from inconsistencies in the mounting surface is small, allowing movement to remain smooth.

Since the distance from the application point of the bearing is large, the internal load generated from a mounting error is large, and the self-adjusting capability is small. With an LM ball guide having angular ball bearings mounted back-to-back, if there is an error in flatness or a deflection in the table, the internal load applied to the block is approximately six times greater than that of the front-to-front mount structure and the service life is much shorter. In addition, the fluctuation in sliding resistance is greater.